Last year I had the indubitable pleasure of viewing some brutal and shocking CCTV.
There I sat, with a trusted colleague and a tight-lipped Sergeant, staring aghast at the images on a screen before me.
The door was closed, and we were the first people to see the footage (with the exception of the CCTV controllers, but they had been forced to sign a gagging order and we’d kidnapped three of their relatives as collateral).
The scene in question was a nameless and narrow high street, filled with clubbers, punters and smokers, with the odd uniformed constable visible on the periphery – ready to spring into action if the situation required.
In the corner of the screen the time displayed was 2344 – so this was clearly a weekend; and in the middle of the shot you could make out a lengthy queue of people waiting outside ‘Revolutions’, or some such other postmodern hell-hole.
To the right of the image, a tall, male police officer in a bright yellow jacket, could be seen wandering down the street with his shorter female crewmate. Both appeared to be ambling in an amicable manner, pausing occasionally to interact with civilians. It all seemed very courteous and unremarkable. A male and a female could then be seen walking past the two police officers.
Suddenly, without so much as an ‘Ello, Ello’, the male officer strides purposefully towards the gentleman and grabs hold of his arm. The female officer follows suit, and the passer-by now finds himself gripped up by two coppers. A struggle ensues, and the male is dragged to the left of the shot, and shoved roughly up against the wall. You can see the female officer pushing hard with one hand and speaking into her radio with the other, while her colleague tries to handcuff the male to the rear.
This doesn’t appear to be working very well, so there is some more rough and tumble, and eventually the officers manage to cuff the male behind his back. He is standing up, but jerking about all over the place – either having a medical fit or a hissy fit – you simply couldn’t tell.
Anyway, although he is facing forwards, he appears to try to head-butt the male police officer, who immediately puts his gloved right hand on the back of the male’s head.
I shift in my seat and stare closely at the screen. This was getting fruity.
My colleague beside me gasps, as the male police officer then shoves the prisoner forwards by the back of his neck, and pushes his head right through a plate glass window.
The Sergeant frowns and shakes his head, stopping the tape and rewinding it. We all watch it again in slow-motion, quietly drawing breath and puffing out our cheeks. We watch it for a third time, and then a fourth. I’d never seen a police officer thrust a prisoner through a window before, so it was certainly worth seeing plenty of times. Shame there wasn’t any popcorn.
The tape stops and we all sit back in our chairs.
‘Fuck me,’ says my colleague.
‘Doesn’t look good,’ says the Sergeant.
‘Hmmm,’ I replied.
That male officer – as you may have already guessed – was me.
So it’s been an interesting few days, what with police officers arresting blameless politicians, beating up war heroes and shooting harmless civilians on the steps of a cathedral. Certain bloggers have examined the case of the Tory politician, and added their thoughts about this particular ’scandal’.
Other police bloggers have focused on the CCTV footage of some corporal being lanced distractedly by a special squad, but I may have read the stories whilst pissed, so I can’t be sure. Whatever the case, there have been some distinct comments from all sectors of society regarding how they feel about this footage. After all, we’re supposed to be protecting you – not smacking your heads off the floor and otherwise performing moves that would make Jake the Snake Roberts nod in appreciation.
Rumour has it that we sometimes employ a tag-team style method – as there’s so many of us to go round – wherein we stand up, run to the sidelines, clang batons together, and the next police officer bursts into the fray with a blood-curdling scream and a sole remit to beat the living crap out of yet another ‘innocent’.
As for me, I didn’t push that male’s head through a window. He fully admitted in interview that he did it himself. And as far as I can recall, he was just a pissed baggage-handler from Heathrow, whose conduct on the street (not at all evident on the CCTV) was certainly deserving police intervention.
He had walked past the queue of nightclub customers and shouted some quite nasty racial abuse at the doorman. I called to him to stop, and he shouted out – whilst walking off – to ‘Fuck off you c**t’, which everyone in the vicinity heard. Some people have made ropey arrests for ‘Section 5′, but I heard several people gasp simultaneously in pure shock, and the doorman was already clambering over the rope to intervene.
When we paused and watched the footage for a fifth time, and zoomed in, it was quite clear – as I knew all along – that my hand wasn’t touching the prisoner’s head when he lurched forwards and smacked his face through the glass. It was simply how it appeared.
And while this does not excuse real police brutality, or fully exonerate officers when they are a touch heavy-handed, it shows that with a certain tilt, some background music, and some choice phrases, you can draw whatever conclusion you want when watching some isolated and decontextualised images from the comfort of your own chair.
PC Michael Pinkstone
This Victorian Playground Part 1 and Part 2 available to order from a shop with a smashed window. Not my fault …

December 2, 2008 at 1:15 pm
As you say, there are always at least two sides to every story.
December 2, 2008 at 2:51 pm
From what I understand, CCTV footage of an arrest almost always looks worse than what actually happened, especially as you tend to be lacking useful things like a mobile viewpoint, depth perception, clarity and sound, all of which you’d have had if you had been present.
Your example demonstrates this well – if the CCTV footage was in 3D, it would probably have been immediately obvious that your hand was not in contact with his head.
Then of course you have the general underestimation by the general public of how many coppers you need to pile onto somebody to get them under control without actually cracking their skull open – and how much violence some people are capable of dishing out and taking when they’re under the influence of various popular reality-distorting substances.
December 2, 2008 at 4:09 pm
My god, I must admit, the way this has been written it did seem like the officer did do it.
But I’m glad to hear you didn’t.
What happened to the man? Was he badly injured? I bet he wished he hadn’t done that.
December 2, 2008 at 5:33 pm
Am glad that he admitted he was responsible for smacking his own head.
Apparently some footage was shown on TV in my home town of police “brutality”
l keep saying to my Mum but you can not hear what’s being said before during or after.
And it is only one camera angle on the problem before or after.
However she is elderly and of the.. it is on cc thingy so it must be right.
I then followed it up with only a damm fool copper would do something in front of cctv that would get him into major trouble. My Mum did partially concede this point.
December 2, 2008 at 6:17 pm
[...] Police Brutality or Drunken Revelry? [...]
December 2, 2008 at 7:55 pm
Very interesting viewpoint. As someone quite familiar with town centre CCTV systems, I can say you have pointed out one of it’s great drawbacks. This is the fact that there is no ‘depth of field’. This effect is used to great effect on Tv and in Cinema, as we are all well aware. Otherwise many actors would have very sore faces, and/or be dead!
In an ideal situation, you would always have at least two cameras looking at the incident from different angles, hopefully to give a ‘3D’ view of the instance. However, in the real world, the sheer cost of installing that many cameras precludes that, plus where there is overlapping coverage, usually the other camera will be being used to watch another incident. Or there will be a tree in the way. Or a lamp post. Or a drunk. Or I won’t have fixed it yet.
Another downside of course, is the quality of the images, even the best CCTV cameras (which are very good) are not ‘broadcast’ quality. They also have to cope with incredibly complicated lighting conditions, even within a single scene. Especially at this time of year with all the decorations. And lastly, you have to compromise on the recording side. To record every camera in an average town centre ‘live’ for 31 days (This is usual, but I do know different authorities vary between 14 to 31 days) you would need something in the region of 320 Tb of memory plus the equipment to use it! So of course, we tend to record the cameras not being used directly by the operators in ‘time lapse’ varying from 3 frames per second upwards, depending on the size of your wallet. This can mean though that actual incidents, like the landing of a punch can be missed, or what appears to be a punch could be a handshake!
As someone once said, you can’t take prisoners from an aeroplane (CCTV), but sure as hell ,you can bomb the bastards! (I have a scheme for fitting machine guns)
December 2, 2008 at 10:01 pm
So no more reliance upon CCTV; back to the old ‘prisoner confession’ at the nick. Glad that we cleared that up, Michael.
December 2, 2008 at 10:43 pm
Yeeaaa…well….awwwwright! (Pause to take tongue out of cheek!)
December 2, 2008 at 11:04 pm
Amusing post!
Vetnurse has a point there – people believe whatever is on the ‘tube and more specifically on the news now.
While i accept that there are a few bad apples in the basket, the assumption that the officer is guilty until proven innocent in CCTV arrest& contested cases is yet another knee-jerk reaction by the media and the SMT to get viewers and keep popularity/targets/government face time etc.
December 3, 2008 at 6:02 pm
Eloquently written as always, and a good point to boot.
I’ve met the DPS before after having false allegations made against me, and to be honest every Professional Standards copper I’ve met has been as pissed off with the crud they have to pay attention to as we are.
December 4, 2008 at 3:28 am
Succinct post. I posted this< a while back on the same thread.
December 5, 2008 at 3:23 pm
“either having a medical fit or a hissy fit – you simply couldn’t tell.”
Sound like classical epileptic fit. Along with strobe lights etc. a large quantity of alcohol and an arrest on CCTV is a known trigger. Could the reflection of a Hi-Vis jacket in a camera lense generate a flickering effect?
Having seen the footage of the arrest of Lance Corporal Aspinall, I read with disbelief (in the Daily Mail -what was I expecting?) that when the police headed to wards him he “fell over in surprise.”
It’s the same with me. When I’m really gobsmacked I get double vision too. The final phase is throwing up in absolute astonishment.
Despite my feeble attempts at humour, your story doesn’t sound funny at all. One man’s admission away from this blog being MOP or (or maybe even HMP) Michael Pinkstone. And for just doing your job. What prevented him from lying and demanding compensation for any injuries? What a daily tightrope.
The footage of those mad Swedish crack addicts on their motorway suicide mission was an excellent example to the uninformed (i.e. non-uniformed) just how difficult it is to restrain a struggling person without an overwhelming strength advantage, especially if they are out of their heads. And how very messy this type of thing always looks on CCTV. It would save the police a lot of unjustified criticism if this were more widely appreciated.
December 5, 2008 at 4:05 pm
Very interesting comments from a variety of angles. In case I don’t have the chance to fully comment on or discuss what everyone writes in relation to all of my posts, I certainly read them all, and appreciate the in-depth and reasoned responses, whether people agree with me or not.